meta bug: info on "why" xfer seems no longer available? (3.1.0)
L. A. Walsh
rsync at tlinx.org
Mon Aug 11 22:27:20 MDT 2014
Kevin Korb wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> You want less -v and more --itemize-changes. --verbose is utterly
> useless without --itemize-changes.
>
Just remembered to check this group... ;-)
Thanks.... I tried it... most were
.f.......a.
Now I'm wondering about this...
hmmm....I dunno if this would be a bug or not (in xfs{d/r})...
The old dir had:
[u::rwx,g::rwx,o::r-x]
w/user=media and group=media
New dir shows:
[u::rwx,u:media:rwx,g::rwx,g:media:rwx,m::rwx,o::r-x]
(also w/user=media and group=media)...
Most likely the dirs had default acls placed on them at some point, but
not sure
if that makes sense, as the new ACL would give same access to the file, so
why bother with it?
Weird.
More information about the rsync
mailing list