[Bug 9783] please don't use client-server model for local copies

samba-bugs at samba.org samba-bugs at samba.org
Fri May 3 14:12:18 MDT 2013


--- Comment #3 from Kilian CAVALOTTI <kilian.cavalotti.work at gmail.com> 2013-05-03 20:12:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> what result does remote scp vs local-copy-on-sshfs give (i.e what is the impact
> of sshfs) ?

They are the comparable, the impact of sshfs is minimal. I used the same SSH
options to conduct the test over a 10GbE link, and checked the speed of the
transfer using the NIC counters. I can't reproduce the tests right now, but on
top of my head, the numbers were:
- pure scp: about 130MB/s
- cp /sshfsmount/path/to/file /tmp/file: about 130MB/s
- rsync host0:/path/to/file /tmp/file: about 130MB/s
- rsync /sshfsmount/path/to/file /tmp/file: about 80MB/s

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

More information about the rsync mailing list