Low performance

[R. Pietsch]

Am 2012-01-07 01:58, schrieb Jesse Molina:
>
> Also try iperf instead of netperf.  As a network admin/eng, I prefer
> iperf for this kind of testing.
Thanks for the info!

I try to capture such a rsync-stream with wireshark.

the times are for example:
10.510155 for the rsync-packet (Len=27512)
10.550024 for the Ack
10.550181 for the next rsync (len=27512)
10.589985 for the Ack

and so on. I do not know if this is a good or a bad value for a 10GBit
link over fibre.


>
>
>
> Rainer Pietsch wrote:
>> Am 06.01.2012 04:27, schrieb Jason Haar:
>>> did you try scp (although that could be CPU-bound due to crypto),
>>> ftp or
>>> wget - ie see how other TCP apps do the same job? If they all show the
>>> same speed - it's not an rsync problem
>>>
>> Ok, I try this.
>>
>> But I assume that netperf do exactly that.
>>
>>
>


-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards

Ing. Rainer Pietsch
----------------------------------------------------------
PCS - Pichler Computer Systeme
Inh. Claudia Pichler-Pietsch
Hauptplatz 10
A-2751 Steinabrückl
Österreich / Austria
----------------------------------------------------------
mail:  r.pietsch at pcs-at.com
web:   http://www.pcs-at.com
tel.:  +43 (2622) 420 19 / 15
mobil: +43 (676) 31 242 69
fax:   +43 (2622) 420 19 / 20
----------------------------------------------------------