Fwd: Re: cwRsync got killed...

[Joachim Otahal (privat)]

AGH !
I postet the wrong checksums, I posted the ones for 
cwRsync_4.2.0_Installer.zip instead of cwRsyncServer_4.2.0_Installer.zip

cwRsyncServer_4.2.0_Installer.zip:
MD5: c787dfa854775793d1a1b5c3502b57b5
SHA-256: 21e608caed9e5e7e1f1f9881729eab0a8fce6e1ff31d85dcb7759d502478160c

The checksums are still right.

Jou

Joachim Otahal (privat) schrieb:
> A bit late, but someone (anonymous) provided a link to download.
> the md5 is correct, it matches the last sourceforge state. And the md5 
> and sha256 mentioned at https://www.itefix.no/i2/node/12862 - before 
> he gave up the project.
> MD5 c787dfa854775793d1a1b5c3502b57b5
> sha256 5abeec588e937bd749456ddb347e4116b0f8407e15f412281fc64c763d1de62d
>
> For obvious reasons you should check the md5 / sha256 after 
> downloading, the file might change without notice : ) .
>
> Content looks good and original, so it is original (with a very high 
> probability).
>
> Side question: Does anyone know the probability of generating a file 
> with the same md5 and sha256 which is still looks valid with the 
> expected content (including the manually unpacked nullsoft installer 
> inside the zip)?
>
> Jou
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Betreff:     Re: cwRsync got killed...
> Datum:     Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:43:29 +0200
> Von:     John Doe <**********@gmail.com>
> An:     Joachim Otahal (privat) <Jou at gmx.net>
>
>
>
> Real name? No, it's not, obviously.
> For some reason I couldn't post this on the rsync forum, where I found 
> your request. Would you, kindly, consider adding the link there?
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Joachim Otahal (privat) <Jou at gmx.net 
> <mailto:Jou at gmx.net>> wrote:
>
>    John Doe schrieb:
>
>        I still have the cwRsyncServer_4.2.0_Installer.zip file.
>        I've uploaded it here:
>        
> http://www.2shared.com/file/212w-aDp/cwRsyncServer_420_Installer.html
>
>
>    Thanks.
>    Is this your real name?
>
>    kind regards,
>
>    Joachim Otahal
>
>