sync prob with big files
kmk at sanitarium.net
Wed Dec 7 09:31:53 MST 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
OK, several things here....
1. according to the man page error code 1 is a syntax error meaning it
is simply failing to run. Try expanding those variables to make sure
they are coming out the way you think they are. Also, capture any
error that rsync outputs (this is actually easier without the -v).
2. --devices and --specials are both included within -a
3. Can CIFS actually handle ACLs, XATTRs, devices, and specials? In
my very limited non-Windows guy experience it can't. OTOH, if both
source and target are CIFS then the source shouldn't have anything
that the target can't handle.
4. You probably shouldn't use --size-only on a regular basis. It is
generally used to correct previous copy methods that didn't sync
timestamps. But since that is included in -a you shouldn't need to
keep using it. It is possible for rsync to miss changes to a file in
this mode because not all changes modify the file size.
On 12/07/11 10:15, fuzzy_4711 wrote:
> Hi list.
> We have 2 NAS-Devices, each mounted on the same (virtual) box. For
> our backup we use bacula. Bacula ist writing its files to the first
> NAS (192.168.1.9). These are big files, up to 160 GB.
> For implementing a good backup strategy we decided to mirror
> (sync) another NAS-Device (192.168.1.8) to have redundant bacula
> backups. If sync is done the Device will be kept at another
> location too.
> I do have problems with syncing. rsync is exiting with error-code
> 1. Sometimes early, sometimes late in progress. This is what I am
> using in a shell script:
> rsync --omit-dir-times --size-only -avzAX \
> --bwlimit=$KILOBYTES_PER_SECOND --devices --specials --numeric-ids
> \ --delete $BACULA_BACKUP_DIR $MOUNT_DIR/$SYNC_DIR
> The bandwidth limit is 2500 kps. Without the limit it was working
> so far since my boss told me to stop using it this way because he
> was afraid of rsync taking all the network resources.
> BTW, both NAS-Devices are mounted aus type cifs. My rsync version
> is rsync version 3.0.7 protocol version 30
> Is this a known issue or does this make sense to anyone in any
> Thanks for your help. -fuz
Kevin Korb Phone: (407) 252-6853
Systems Administrator Internet:
FutureQuest, Inc. Kevin at FutureQuest.net (work)
Orlando, Florida kmk at sanitarium.net (personal)
Web page: http://www.sanitarium.net/
PGP public key available on web site.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the rsync