fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)

[Ben Gamari]

On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:09:29 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro at jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :)
> 
Alright, fair enough. It still seems like there are many cases where
fadvise seems more appropriate, but memcg should at least satisfy my
personal needs so I'll shut up now. Thanks!

- Ben