Rsync shortcutting output?
paul+rsync at wurtel.net
Fri Dec 18 05:33:57 MST 2009
On Thu 17 Dec 2009, Joel Peabody wrote:
> The meaning of my question is twofold. First, if this is a known issue
> and what I'm seeing is, in fact, what's intended to happen on systems of
> this size. Second, is there any feature, flag, or setting that is either
> being overlooked in my rsync command or is otherwise undocumented. Is
> there some sort of switch that can be flicked either in the rsync setup or
> my unitilization of it to force it to put out full filenames that is not
> covered in the manpage, or is there and I'm not seeing it?
All I can say is that:
--progress is not suitable for logging to a file (or reporting to a
you use -i (itemize changes) but I see no related output in your
So something in the way you log the output isn't quite right.
More information about the rsync