Rsync shortcutting output?

[Paul Slootman]

On Thu 17 Dec 2009, Joel Peabody wrote:
> 
> The meaning of my question is twofold.  First, if this is a known issue
> and what I'm seeing is, in fact, what's intended to happen on systems of
> this size.  Second, is there any feature, flag, or setting that is either
> being overlooked in my rsync command or is otherwise undocumented.  Is
> there some sort of switch that can be flicked either in the rsync setup or
> my unitilization of it to force it to put out full filenames that is not
> covered in the manpage, or is there and I'm not seeing it?

All I can say is that:

    --progress is not suitable for logging to a file (or reporting to a
    mailinglist)
    you use -i (itemize changes) but I see no related output in your
    message

So something in the way you log the output isn't quite right.


Paul