Step between --dry-run and running?
matt at mattmccutchen.net
Sat May 31 21:31:18 GMT 2008
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 14:35 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> Is there either a step, or a recipe for a step between
> --dry-run and actually running?
> In a particular instance, --dry-run isn't enough. I want
> to actually attempt to read the entire file in, but then write
> it out to nowhere. I'm trying to see if it generates any disk
> errors that may hurt during an actual transfer.
That would be --only-write-batch.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20080531/10ab3985/attachment.bin
More information about the rsync