rsync 2.6.9 uses a lot of memory; has that changed in rsync
matt at mattmccutchen.net
Mon Aug 4 20:50:42 GMT 2008
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 13:22 -0700, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Has the issue with rsync using a lot of memory if there are a lot
> of files been addressed in 3.0?
> I checked the rsync FAQ and it says this issue would require a major
> rewrite of rsync, not sure if that entry is up to date or not - 3.0 is
> a major rewrite AFAIK.
The issue has been addressed by the addition of incremental recursion in
rsync 3.0.0. However, I would not call rsync 3.0 a rewrite: there are
many added features and bug fixes but the codebase is just as tangled
(IMHO; Wayne may disagree) as ever.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20080804/abb97aff/attachment.bin
More information about the rsync