updating_basis set in wrong place in recv_files?

[Wayne Davison]

On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 03:44:06PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> But according to your own comment on the definition of updating_basis,
> it is true when "We're either updating the basis file or an identical
> copy", and indeed this is the relevant condition for optimizing writes.

Yes, thanks for reminding me of that.  The latest code now has a better
name for the variable and sets it for the backup case.  Much appreciated!

..wayne..