using rsync 3.0.0 CVS version
shaibn at gmail.com
Tue Jan 30 15:21:35 GMT 2007
Same here. I did my initial test and where before it used to hang, it
doesn't now :)
Thanks for tonight's update!
On 1/30/07, Paul Slootman <paul at debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon 29 Jan 2007, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 06:33:19PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > > Unfortunately the current CVS version (updated a couple of hours ago)
> > > still hangs :(
> > I found another potential hang scenario that could happen if the
> > generator was having to wait for a new file list to arrive, but failed
> > to tell the sender that the oldest file-list had been completed.
> > The code that I just checked into CVS handles this all in a much better
> > fashion, so I'm hoping that it should make it through your big transfer
> > without hanging now. (The "nightly" tar file was updated as well.)
> I did a cvs update, and rebuilt my rsync.
> It now survived a pass over one of my large dirs, and it's almost
> through the next one as well :-) Perhaps too early to say for sure,
> but it's looking good.
> It also did the sync in under 2 hours, whereas the non-incremental
> version would take up to 12 hours, and use up to 500MB of memory.
> Paul Slootman
> To unsubscribe or change options:
> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
More information about the rsync