HTTP encapsulated rsync??
Aaron W Morris
aaronwmorris at gmail.com
Tue Apr 17 17:27:02 GMT 2007
On 4/17/07, Robert Denton <robert at headsprout.com> wrote:
> Hi folks, I am hoping someone here can offer some suggestions. Here
> is my situation:
>
> I am using rsync over the internet for several hundred clients to
> keep them in sync with a master repository of files. The rsync
> daemon is listening on port 80, because most of the clients are
> behind firewalls that only allow outbound port 80 (and other common
> ports). This works fine for most of them but not all.
>
> The trouble is that some of them are also behind devices that do not
> allow non-http traffic on port 80 and thus block the rsync.
> Therefore, I am looking for a way to use http encapsulation as a
> means to bypass the blocking devices. I have seen a few scattered
> queries around the net asking similar questions but I have not seen
> any good solutions offered.
>
> One person suggested that http-tunnel be used but this is not a very
> elegant solution and I would like to avoid it if at all possible. If
> the tunnel were to hang or sever then I would have a difficult time
> correcting it since I do not have direct access to many of the
> clients. Does anyone here have any ideas? Surely I am not the first
> person to ask this question. Thanks!!
>
> Robert
You can use an HTTP proxy. Look at the RSYNC_PROXY environment
variable in the man page.
--
Aaron W Morris (decep)
More information about the rsync
mailing list