rsync shows poor throughput vs. scp
Marty Mulligan
marty at webmayhem.net
Thu May 25 06:24:04 GMT 2006
Thanks for your suggestions. I'll try to put together an rsync call
with a more explicit set of options, although I was under the
impressions that by having the "dont compress" option set in the conf
file on the server, the -z option in the call from the host was ignored
(which begs the question, "why the -z in the call from the host?" :) )
> (I suspect that here is a case where you use rsync because it's easier
> to figure out rsync
> that to use something (actually quite different) that is more
> "appropriate".
>
hmm... ok, I am open to suggestions! What do you recommend that would
be more appropriate? One thing I am currently investigating is "File
Alteration Monitor" or fam, which was alluded to somewhere in this lists
archives.
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
More information about the rsync
mailing list