[Bug 2104] Implement --only-write-batch=FILE

samba-bugs at samba.org samba-bugs at samba.org
Mon Mar 28 16:36:41 GMT 2005


wayned at samba.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
            Summary|Add support for --dry-run   |Implement --only-write-
                   |with --write-batch          |batch=FILE

------- Additional Comments From wayned at samba.org  2005-03-28 09:36 -------
I want --dry-run to always indicate that no changes will be made whatsoever, so
I'm changing the summary of this bug to correspond with a new option that now
has a diff in the "patches" dir of CVS:  --only-write-batch=FILE.  This option
accomplishes the functionality you requested, while both avoiding the
aforementioned compatibility problem that using --write-batch would entail, and
allowing --dry-run to be fixed to work properly with --write-batch/--read-batch
(which is now the case in CVS -- this combo just reports what would happen
without --dry-run).

Note that 2.6.4 won't have this new option because the patch still needs some
more testing (and the option name may change before the dust settles).

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

More information about the rsync mailing list