Premature optimization in f_name_cmp()?

Wayne Davison wayned at
Mon Mar 14 17:50:48 GMT 2005

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 06:24:15PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> Could this be the reason why my rsync 2.6.4pre2 seems to be doing nothing 
> for a long time after it has said how much files it considers ?

Seems like a likely reason.

> Would a current CVS checkout have a fix for this so I can verify this ?
> Is CVS in proper shape currently ?

Yes, the CVS version (as well as the latest "nightly" tar file) is in
good shape and has this fix.  I'm considering releasing what's there as
2.6.4pre3, so if you'd care to try this out, that would be a nice pre-
release test for this latest version.


More information about the rsync mailing list