[Bug 2780] New: fix acl patch
samba-bugs at samba.org
samba-bugs at samba.org
Thu Jun 9 07:39:50 GMT 2005
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2780
Summary: fix acl patch
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: flepied at mandriva.com
QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org
--- rsync-2.6.5/patches/acls.diff.acl-patch 2005-06-01 18:22:41.000000000 +0200
+++ rsync-2.6.5/patches/acls.diff 2005-06-09 09:10:29.628842558 +0200
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
+HEADERS=byteorder.h config.h errcode.h proto.h rsync.h smb_acls.h lib/pool_alloc.h
LIBOBJ=lib/wildmatch.o lib/compat.o lib/snprintf.o lib/mdfour.o \
- lib/permstring.o lib/pool_alloc.o @LIBOBJS@
-+ lib/permstring.o lib/pool_alloc.o lib/sysacls.o @LIBOBJS@
++ lib/permstring.o lib/pool_alloc.o sysacls.o @LIBOBJS@
ZLIBOBJ=zlib/deflate.o zlib/infblock.o zlib/infcodes.o zlib/inffast.o \
zlib/inflate.o zlib/inftrees.o zlib/infutil.o zlib/trees.o \
zlib/zutil.o zlib/adler32.o
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
+/* handle passing ACLs between systems */
+
+#include "rsync.h"
-+#include "lib/sysacls.h"
++#include "sysacls.h"
+
+#ifdef SUPPORT_ACLS
+
@@ -4735,7 +4735,7 @@
? FCLIENT : FINFO;
--- orig/rsync.h 2005-05-03 17:11:01
+++ rsync.h 2005-05-12 23:32:56
-@@ -638,6 +638,44 @@ struct stats {
+@@ -638,6 +638,46 @@
#include "lib/permstring.h"
#include "lib/addrinfo.h"
@@ -4777,9 +4777,18 @@
+#endif /* SUPPORT_ACLS */
+#include "smb_acls.h"
+
++#define UNUSED(x) x __attribute__((__unused__))
++
#include "proto.h"
/* We have replacement versions of these if they're missing. */
+@@ -861,6 +901,4 @@
+ const char *get_panic_action(void);
+ #endif
+
+-#define UNUSED(x) x __attribute__((__unused__))
+-
+ extern const char *io_write_phase, *io_read_phase;
--- orig/rsync.yo 2005-05-22 20:53:34
+++ rsync.yo 2004-07-03 20:11:58
@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ to the detailed description below for a
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the rsync
mailing list