batch applied: "Directory not empty (66)"
rsk at misinformation.org
Thu Dec 8 06:45:35 GMT 2005
"rsync version 2.6.6 protocol version 29"
In my source I have a directory that changed to a file. I know this
requires --force or --delete, but using --only-write-batch I get no
error until I attempt to apply the batch.
This confused me for a bit. Is this intended behavior?
Also, unrelatedly, when rsync refuses to apply a specific change
from a batch due to the destination not being in the right state, is
there any way to get more detail on what aspect triggered the
More information about the rsync