How about a --min-size option, next to --max-size
wayned at samba.org
Thu Apr 28 17:24:38 GMT 2005
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 03:10:52PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> Would a patch for --min-size be acceptable?
Firstly, thanks for the patch -- I've tweaked it a bit and checked it
into the patches subdir. It also prompted me to move the code in
generator.c that checks the maximum size so that it doesn't apply to
non-regular files (since some non-regular files might have a bogus
size). Finally, I used your idea of having a separate size-parsing
function in options.c (this doesn't change how the CVS version works,
but it does make the min-size patch smaller).
As for accepting --min-size, I'm considering it. It would be nice to
have a more general solution to the problem of limiting the transfer
based on a file's attributes (rather than a profusion of rsync options),
but that doesn't seem to be on the horizon at the moment.
More information about the rsync