rsync 2.6.2 hang (was rsync 2.6.2 crash)
jim
jim at thegallaghers.biz
Wed Sep 29 05:26:01 GMT 2004
Hey, that's pretty funny. Actually, I would much prefer a Linux environment, but I don't
always get what I want. We are primarily a Windows and HP-UX shop, so it's not so
easy get the powers that be to buy into a Linux box. In addition, I'm using several
sets of in-house libraries for this project that have not been built on Linux. I could
easily burn another couple of months setting up build environments and testing
the Linux builds. Not going to happen at this point.
Our low-end server environment is W2K3, so that's what I'm stuck with.
-------Original Message-------
> From: Chuck Wolber <chuckw at quantumlinux.com>
> Subject: Re: rsync 2.6.2 hang (was rsync 2.6.2 crash)
> Sent: 28 Sep 2004 21:13:47
>
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, jim wrote:
>
> > OK, I set up a new PC with a fresh XP load to be my rsync server. Rsync
> > by itself seems to work fine (thank God. I'm going nuts.)
> >
> > I am still having problems when I throw ssh into the mix. At least now,
> > things don't crash, but they do hang. The file list gets build, the
> > transfer starts and it gets through maybe a few hundred files, but then
> > everything stops. All the processes are still there, but all logging
> > stops and CPU utilization by the rsync and ssh processes go to zero.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
>
> Install Linux instead of XP? Seriously, I gotta wonder why you are serving
> rsync in an environment that it's really not meant to be used in?
>
> FWIW; We use rsync (under Linux) to back up folders on Windows machines
> quite a bit. Works great.
>
> -Chuck
>
>
> --
> http://www.quantumlinux.com
> Quantum Linux Laboratories, LLC.
> ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology
>
> "The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply
> social values more noble than mere monetary profit." - FDR
-------Original Message-------
More information about the rsync
mailing list