paulh at hamjudo.com
Tue Jun 1 15:34:20 GMT 2004
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, John wrote:
> That may be so, but I don't think this is one of them. rsyncx is bound to have
> all rsync's bugs. Qute possibly some will be fixed first there, and it may be
> they will add valuable new features. One that I think would be nice is an
> automatic retry: I keep getting timeouts transferring between two ADSL accounts
> and I've not decide whether to blame Arachnet (the ISP at both ends) or rsync
> or even to suppose I'm expecting too much.
That used to happen to me. Upgrading the firmware in my network hardware
fixed the problem.
> wget has an option to automatically retry after timeouts, and it would
> certainly be useful to me if rsync did too.
> I may well decide to implement that myself: if I do, it would probably be in
> rsyncx if I decide that is where it would best suit me.
The ideal place would be in ssh.
> Enough. I'm typing on a remote machine over an overtaxed dialup line:-(
> To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
More information about the rsync