HP-UX 11i and largefiles on rsync 2.6.2
Steve Bonds
knnf6cy7w001 at sneakemail.com
Thu Jul 29 16:23:04 GMT 2004
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Chris Shoemaker c.shoemaker-at-cox.net |Rsync List| wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:57:58AM -0700, Steve Bonds wrote:
> > The mkstemp man page suggests using tmpfile() instead, which
> > generally means that HP won't fix any problems.
> >
> > ----- mktemp(3C)
> > Remarks:
> > These functions are provided solely for backward compatibility and
> > importability of applications, and are not recommended for new
> > applications where portability is important. For portable
> > applications, use tmpfile() instead (see tmpfile(3S)).
> > -----
>
> Maybe we should follow this advice.
This is actually terrible advice because of the race condition mentioned
below. For example, from the Linux man page for tmpnam(3):
-----
BUGS
Never use this function. Use mkstemp(3) instead.
-----
I tend to agree with that sentiment. ;-)
> > The tempnam()/tmpfile() combination seems particularly difficult to use
> > compared with mkstemp(). I especially liked this warning:
> >
> > ----- tmpnam(3S)
> > WARNINGS
> > Between the time a file name is created and the file is opened, it is
> > possible for some other process to create a file with the same name.
> > This can never happen if that other process is using these functions
> > or mktemp, and the file names are chosen such that duplication by
> > other means is unlikely.
> > -----
>
> Can we use tmpfile without tmpname?
No, since rsync should create the temp file in the same directory as the
final destination file. There is no way to feed a "template" to tmpfile
to tell it where to create the file, so they all generally end up in /tmp
unless the system defines a really odd default location.
If rsync didn't create the file in the same directory I can see two
issues:
1) Filling up /tmp on large file transfers
2) Instead of a fast rename in the same filesystem, the whole
contents of the file would need to be copied out of /tmp to
the final location, slowing things down significantly
-- Steve
More information about the rsync
mailing list