Rsync, Cygwin, & SSH: ntsec OR nontsec?
Lapo Luchini
lapo at lapo.it
Sat Jul 24 10:19:07 GMT 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Brian wrote:
> I am not using either of them right now--should I? Also, I
> heard ssh has a problem with one of these settings. Is that still the
> case?
My own CYGWIN env still contains ntsec, but now it's in by default and
should work OK in all cases, so you shouln't really need it.
SSH should be automatically ntsec-aware and behave correctly, this was
fixed a long time ago:
<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg02048.html>
Have you tried to use simple "scp" to copy that files?
(not as a final solution, of course!, but just to test if the problem is
the same on that directories)
Lapo
- --
L a p o L u c h i n i
l a p o @ l a p o . i t
w w w . l a p o . i t /
http://www.megatokyo.it
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkECN5sACgkQaJiCLMjyUvt3DQCg34h69RaekBhyrrSU+LzVNoI7
hIgAn1OspqlSNQGZGUixVYqp6+uHRbTI
=jOlY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the rsync
mailing list