FW: rsync performance
Ben Escoto
bescoto at stanford.edu
Sun Sep 14 12:46:05 EST 2003
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:05:09 -0700 jw schultz <jw at pegasys.ws> wrote:
> Rsync is not an efficient local copy utility. It can be
> used for local copying but local and high-bandwidth network
> speed is sacrificed for low-bandwidth performance and for
> data integrity.
I've been surprised at how fast rsync can copy locally. For instance,
http://mail.nongnu.org/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2002-12/msg00066.html
finds 'rsync -aH --delete' faster than 'cp -a'. Perhaps though this
was some idiosyncracy of my test (the main purpose wasn't to benchmark
rsync anyway).
--
Ben Escoto
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20030913/0d835fa8/attachment.bin
More information about the rsync
mailing list