Possible security hole

Wayne Davison wayned at samba.org
Sun Oct 5 09:56:16 EST 2003


On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:38:48PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> 	for (i=0; i < (int) s->count;i++) {

Yeah, that's pretty bad.  Attached is a patch that should fix this and a
number of other related problems where the code assumed that size_t
would fit into an int.  There looks to be a bunch more to do, though.
For instance, a couple months ago I was starting to look at variable
sizes after I had noticed that this struct had a bunch of size_t values
in it that were being stored into int variables for processing:

struct sum_struct {
       OFF_T flength;          /**< total file length */
       size_t count;           /**< how many chunks */
       size_t remainder;       /**< flength % block_length */
       size_t blength;         /**< block_length */
       size_t s2length;        /**< sum2_length */
       struct sum_buf *sums;   /**< points to info for each chunk */
};

The problem variables are remainder, block_length, and s2length.  My
initial reaction was to resize these three values in the struct to be
"int"s, but I haven't verified that they're really guaranteed to fit.

Anyway, this patch was prepared pretty quickly, so if anyone notices
something wrong with it, let me know.

..wayne..
-------------- next part --------------
Index: checksum.c
--- checksum.c	9 Sep 2003 15:58:48 -0000	1.27
+++ checksum.c	4 Oct 2003 23:41:39 -0000
@@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
   a simple 32 bit checksum that can be upadted from either end
   (inspired by Mark Adler's Adler-32 checksum)
   */
-uint32 get_checksum1(char *buf1,int len)
+uint32 get_checksum1(char *buf1, size_t len)
 {
-    int i;
+    size_t i;
     uint32 s1, s2;
     schar *buf = (schar *)buf1;
 
@@ -49,11 +49,11 @@
 }
 
 
-void get_checksum2(char *buf,int len,char *sum)
+void get_checksum2(char *buf, size_t len, char *sum)
 {
-	int i;
+	size_t i;
 	static char *buf1;
-	static int len1;
+	static size_t len1;
 	struct mdfour m;
 
 	if (len > len1) {
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
 }
 
 
-static int sumresidue;
+static size_t sumresidue;
 static char sumrbuf[CSUM_CHUNK];
 static struct mdfour md;
 
@@ -152,9 +152,9 @@
  * @todo Perhaps get rid of md and just pass in the address each time.
  * Very slightly clearer and slower.
  **/
-void sum_update(char *p, int len)
+void sum_update(char *p, size_t len)
 {
-	int i;
+	size_t i;
 	if (len + sumresidue < CSUM_CHUNK) {
 		memcpy(sumrbuf+sumresidue, p, len);
 		sumresidue += len;
Index: generator.c
--- generator.c	11 Sep 2003 04:53:05 -0000	1.57
+++ generator.c	4 Oct 2003 23:41:40 -0000
@@ -192,10 +192,10 @@
 	sum->remainder	= (len % blength);
 
 	if (sum->count && verbose > 2) {
-		rprintf(FINFO, "count=%ld rem=%ld blength=%ld s2length=%ld flength=%.0f\n",
-			(long) sum->count, (long) sum->remainder,
-			(long) sum->blength, (long) sum->s2length,
-			(double) sum->flength);
+		rprintf(FINFO, "count=%.0f rem=%.0f blength=%.0f s2length=%.0f flength=%.0f\n",
+			(double)sum->count, (double)sum->remainder,
+			(double)sum->blength, (double)sum->s2length,
+			(double)sum->flength);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@
  *
  * Generate approximately one checksum every block_len bytes.
  */
-static void generate_and_send_sums(struct map_struct *buf, OFF_T len, int f_out)
+static void generate_and_send_sums(struct map_struct *buf, size_t len, int f_out)
 {
 	size_t i;
 	struct sum_struct sum;
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
 	write_sum_head(f_out, &sum);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < sum.count; i++) {
-		int n1 = MIN(len, sum.blength);
+		size_t n1 = MIN(len, sum.blength);
 		char *map = map_ptr(buf, offset, n1);
 		uint32 sum1 = get_checksum1(map, n1);
 		char sum2[SUM_LENGTH];
@@ -247,8 +247,8 @@
 
 		if (verbose > 3) {
 			rprintf(FINFO,
-				"chunk[%ld] offset=%.0f len=%d sum1=%08lx\n",
-				(long)i,(double)offset,n1,(unsigned long)sum1);
+				"chunk[%.0f] offset=%.0f len=%.0f sum1=%08lx\n",
+				(double)i,(double)offset,(double)n1,(unsigned long)sum1);
 		}
 		write_int(f_out, sum1);
 		write_buf(f_out, sum2, sum.s2length);
Index: match.c
--- match.c	22 Aug 2003 21:26:08 -0000	1.56
+++ match.c	4 Oct 2003 23:41:40 -0000
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 typedef unsigned short tag;
 
 #define TABLESIZE (1<<16)
-#define NULL_TAG (-1)
+#define NULL_TAG ((size_t)-1)
 
 static int false_alarms;
 static int tag_hits;
@@ -41,12 +41,12 @@
 
 struct target {
 	tag t;
-	int i;
+	size_t i;
 };
 
 static struct target *targets;
 
-static int *tag_table;
+static size_t *tag_table;
 
 #define gettag2(s1,s2) (((s1) + (s2)) & 0xFFFF)
 #define gettag(sum) gettag2((sum)&0xFFFF,(sum)>>16)
@@ -59,16 +59,16 @@
 
 static void build_hash_table(struct sum_struct *s)
 {
-	int i;
+	size_t i;
 
 	if (!tag_table)
-		tag_table = (int *)malloc(sizeof(tag_table[0])*TABLESIZE);
+		tag_table = (size_t*)malloc(sizeof(tag_table[0])*TABLESIZE);
 
 	targets = (struct target *)malloc(sizeof(targets[0])*s->count);
 	if (!tag_table || !targets)
 		out_of_memory("build_hash_table");
 
-	for (i = 0; i < (int)s->count; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < s->count; i++) {
 		targets[i].i = i;
 		targets[i].t = gettag(s->sums[i].sum1);
 	}
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
 	for (i = 0; i < TABLESIZE; i++)
 		tag_table[i] = NULL_TAG;
 
-	for (i = s->count-1; i >= 0; i--)
+	for (i = s->count; i-- > 0; )
 		tag_table[targets[i].t] = i;
 }
 
@@ -138,15 +138,15 @@
 static void hash_search(int f,struct sum_struct *s,
 			struct map_struct *buf,OFF_T len)
 {
-	OFF_T offset, end;
-	int j,k, last_i;
+	OFF_T k, offset, end;
+	size_t last_i;
 	char sum2[SUM_LENGTH];
 	uint32 s1, s2, sum;
 	schar *map;
 
 	/* last_i is used to encourage adjacent matches, allowing the RLL coding of the
 	   output to work more efficiently */
-	last_i = -1;
+	last_i = (size_t)-1;
 
 	if (verbose > 2)
 		rprintf(FINFO,"hash search b=%ld len=%.0f\n",
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
 	s1 = sum & 0xFFFF;
 	s2 = sum >> 16;
 	if (verbose > 3)
-		rprintf(FINFO, "sum=%.8x k=%d\n", sum, k);
+		rprintf(FINFO, "sum=%.8x k=%.0f\n", sum, (double)k);
 
 	offset = 0;
 
@@ -173,19 +173,19 @@
 	do {
 		tag t = gettag2(s1,s2);
 		int done_csum2 = 0;
+		size_t j = tag_table[t];
 
-		j = tag_table[t];
 		if (verbose > 4)
 			rprintf(FINFO,"offset=%.0f sum=%08x\n",(double)offset,sum);
 
-		if (j == NULL_TAG) {
+		if (j == NULL_TAG)
 			goto null_tag;
-		}
 
 		sum = (s1 & 0xffff) | (s2 << 16);
 		tag_hits++;
-		for (; j < (int) s->count && targets[j].t == t; j++) {
-			int l, i = targets[j].i;
+		for (; j < s->count && targets[j].t == t; j++) {
+			int l;
+			size_t i = targets[j].i;
 
 			if (sum != s->sums[i].sum1) continue;
 
@@ -194,8 +194,8 @@
 			if (l != s->sums[i].len) continue;
 
 			if (verbose > 3)
-				rprintf(FINFO,"potential match at %.0f target=%d %d sum=%08x\n",
-					(double)offset,j,i,sum);
+				rprintf(FINFO,"potential match at %.0f target=%.0f %.0f sum=%08x\n",
+					(double)offset,(double)j,(double)i,sum);
 
 			if (!done_csum2) {
 				map = (schar *)map_ptr(buf,offset,l);
@@ -210,8 +210,8 @@
 
 			/* we've found a match, but now check to see
 			 * if last_i can hint at a better match */
-			for (j++; j < (int) s->count && targets[j].t == t; j++) {
-				int i2 = targets[j].i;
+			for (j++; j < s->count && targets[j].t == t; j++) {
+				size_t i2 = targets[j].i;
 				if (i2 == last_i + 1) {
 					if (sum != s->sums[i2].sum1) break;
 					if (memcmp(sum2,s->sums[i2].sum2,s->s2length) != 0) break;
Index: proto.h
--- proto.h	16 Sep 2003 02:49:59 -0000	1.160
+++ proto.h	4 Oct 2003 23:41:40 -0000
@@ -24,11 +24,11 @@
 int read_batch_delta_file(char *buff, int len);
 void show_flist(int index, struct file_struct **fptr);
 void show_argvs(int argc, char *argv[]);
-uint32 get_checksum1(char *buf1,int len);
-void get_checksum2(char *buf,int len,char *sum);
+uint32 get_checksum1(char *buf1, size_t len);
+void get_checksum2(char *buf, size_t len, char *sum);
 void file_checksum(char *fname,char *sum,OFF_T size);
 void sum_init(void);
-void sum_update(char *p, int len);
+void sum_update(char *p, size_t len);
 void sum_end(char *sum);
 void close_all(void);
 void _exit_cleanup(int code, const char *file, int line);


More information about the rsync mailing list