Update included popt to version 1.7
jos at catnook.com
Sun May 4 09:44:50 EST 2003
On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 12:35:28AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Jos Backus wrote:
> > (Incidentally, this is one of those times I wish we were using something
> > better than CVS, which in my opinion has poor support for vendor code
> > maintenance.)
> CVS vendor branches aren't perfect, but they do the job well enough. Is
> there some reason they aren't being used for rsync's popt?
Not sure, but I guess we should.
Fwiw, I see people on the FreeBSD lists complain all the time about problems
with taking files off the vendor branch in order to apply local changes. I'm
no expert but if these folks complain about the mechanism there must be
something to it, methinks.
We use a Perforce clone at work, and things like this are much easier. Having
atomic commits and numbered changelists is very nice, too, and makes CVS look
kind of outdated. Hopefully the Subversion folks are making good progress.
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Sunnyvale, CA
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/ _/ _/
jos at catnook.com _/_/ _/_/_/ require 'std/disclaimer'
More information about the rsync