Some C help patching sender.c (from:plain source -> encrypted
destination: rsync + gpg)
jw schultz
jw at pegasys.ws
Tue Jul 8 10:35:44 EST 2003
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 07:45:00AM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> >>I have seen Kyle's approach of handling the forking directly, and I know
> >>I cannot handle that level of complexity. Using something like popen (I
> >>am using
> >><http://www.gnu.org/manual/glibc-2.2.3/html_chapter/libc_15.html> as
> >>reference) I can probably get away with.
> >
> >
> >Fine, as long as it is for your own use only.
>
> I don't want to sound more stupid that I naturally am, but could you
> elaborate? Is this because you generally don't consider this patch
> interesting for the main trunk or because there are problems with
> popen() that I should know about?
>
> And, if there are problems with popen, what are those?
Not a case of known problems but one of caution regarding
portability. Given that this is is unlikely to be in
mainline for a long while such caution may be excessive.
> >>One of my concerns is that even though we are setting --whole-file, when
> >>I follow the program logic and the output of test runs with -vvv it is
> >>still computing CRCs and (at least seems to be) preparing deltas.
> >
> >
> >Correct. As can be found by a grep for whole_file,
> >whole-file works by operating on an empty blocksum array.
> >Besides we want the CRCs calculated as an extra level of
> >integrity checks.
>
> Ok. Then I'll probably want to fudge the CRC's, although probably Kyle's
> patch is already taking care of that.
Just let match_sums do its work as always. Besides,
depending on what external processing you do, whole-file
might not be optimal.
> (...)
>
> >>Second concern: where is the reading and transmission of th file
> >>happening? If the do_open is in line 183, where's the read/transmit,
> >>map_file() line 202 puts the data uin buf, and then, what? You see,
> >>write_int doesn't use buf.
> >>
> >>And where is the handle closed?
> >
> >
> >Look further down, buf is transmitted by match_sums() and fd is
> >closed shortly thereafter.
>
> Yay! match_sums() is actually doing the transmissions. Hmmm.
>
> Let's see what I can glean from that.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> martin
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe or change options:
> http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
--
________________________________________________________________
J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
email address: jw at pegasys.ws
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
More information about the rsync
mailing list