bug? -z option and large compressed data

[Wayne Davison]

On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 06:48:58PM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> I don't care for the liternal 128, particularly uncommented.

Yeah, 128 was a quick, more-than-enough value.  I've improved the patch
and checked in the result.  I wish zlib.h had a define that implemented
their rule for how  much potential expansion can occur when compressing
a buffer, but since it didn't, I created a define based on the comments.

..wayne..