Proposal that we now create two branches - 2_5 and head

jw schultz jw at
Wed Jan 29 15:30:10 EST 2003

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:24:57PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2003, "Green, Paul" <Paul.Green at> wrote:
> > I think splitting the branches will also let us be a little more
> > experimental in the development branch, at least until we get near
> > the next release phase, because we'll always have the field release
> > in which to make crucial bug fixes available quickly.
> I agree that this would be a good approach if and only if there is
> energy to do lots of development in the head branch.  What do you have
> in mind?

And if such development rendered the code sufficiently
unstable that we couldn't safely release a new version for
security patches, if needed.

	J.W. Schultz            Pegasystems Technologies
	email address:		jw at

		Remember Cernan and Schmitt

More information about the rsync mailing list