Proposal that we now create two branches - 2_5 and head

Martin Pool mbp at
Wed Jan 29 15:24:57 EST 2003

On 28 Jan 2003, "Green, Paul" <Paul.Green at> wrote:

> I think splitting the branches will also let us be a little more
> experimental in the development branch, at least until we get near
> the next release phase, because we'll always have the field release
> in which to make crucial bug fixes available quickly.

I agree that this would be a good approach if and only if there is
energy to do lots of development in the head branch.  What do you have
in mind?


More information about the rsync mailing list