Prepping for a new release (2.5.8? 2.6.0?)
cbarratt at users.sourceforge.net
cbarratt at users.sourceforge.net
Wed Dec 17 00:12:09 EST 2003
jw schultz writes:
> I wish we had a better handle on the cygwin hang and
> craigb-perf but i don't want to slow things down.
> CVS is solid on *x now.
As noted in the follow-up emails, it would be great if craigb-perf
goes into CVS just after the next release. That will give it
plenty of testing time prior to the subsequent release. I've
received a number of emails along the lines of the one below.
Also, does craigb-perf still apply cleanly to CVS? I'm just
on dialup right now (ugh) so it's not a quick check for me.
It would be good if craigb-perf can at least be applied
cleanly to a 2.5.8/2.6.0 release.
I'm also hoping that the next cygwin release(s) solves the hang
problems, but I haven't done testing yet.
Craig
##################################################
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:37:24 -0500
Subject: Re: craigb-perf
From: Daniel Drucker
To: Craig Barratt
daniel> I think you should push to get your rsync patch applied by
daniel> default to Cygwin's distributed rsync.exe... it changed my
daniel> backup time from six hours to four minutes...
craig> Wow, that's impressive. Are you sure that both tests had the same
craig> initial conditions (ie: you were not also seeing the speedup in the
craig> second test because most of the files were unchanged)?
Yes, I made quite sure of that :)
Daniel
More information about the rsync
mailing list