MD4 checksum fix
jw schultz
jw at pegasys.ws
Tue Apr 1 18:33:57 EST 2003
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:28:09PM -0800, cbarratt at users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > I've not heard from you on the adaptive checksum length patch.
> > I shall be committing it shortly subject to objections or
> > further discussion.
>
> Sorry, I've been extremely busy (http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/030326/265186_1.html).
> I've been following the discussion and the patch looks good.
>
> > I would like to see the MD4 checksums fixed as well. We are
> > very close to the upper limit on protocol versions for
> > deployed versions of rsync. Therefore, i would like to
> > minimize protocol increments for a while. In any other
> > circumstance i wouldn't suggest doing so but i think it
> > would be a good idea to integrate these two fixes in one
> > protocol bump.
>
> I agree, they should be done together. I don't have my original
> patch but I can reimplement it with the correct remote_version
> dependence and send it in the next couple of days (by Thursday
> evening). My intent is the minimal set of changes, rather than
> changing the internals.
That is a workable timeframe, thanks.
--
________________________________________________________________
J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
email address: jw at pegasys.ws
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
More information about the rsync
mailing list