MD4 checksum fix

cbarratt at cbarratt at
Tue Apr 1 17:28:09 EST 2003

> I've not heard from you on the adaptive checksum length patch.
> I shall be committing it shortly subject to objections or
> further discussion.

Sorry, I've been extremely busy (
I've been following the discussion and the patch looks good.

> I would like to see the MD4 checksums fixed as well.  We are
> very close to the upper limit on protocol versions for
> deployed versions of rsync.  Therefore, i would like to
> minimize protocol increments for a while.  In any other
> circumstance i wouldn't suggest doing so but i think it
> would be a good idea to integrate these two fixes in one
> protocol bump.

I agree, they should be done together.  I don't have my original
patch but I can reimplement it with the correct remote_version
dependence and send it in the next couple of days (by Thursday
evening).  My intent is the minimal set of changes, rather than
changing the internals.


More information about the rsync mailing list