rsync 2.5.4 (probably 2.5.5 too) server handles SIGPIPE very
jik at kamens.brookline.ma.us
Mon Jun 3 05:31:01 EST 2002
Earlier today, I wrote:
> I don't agree that this is a better solution, especially given your
> comment in the last sentence above.
Please allow me to recant my previous testimony :-).
In the worst-case scenario, your solution causes one extra level of
recursion into rwrite, whereas with my solution, if someone calls
rwrite to attempt to write to a hosed output socket when they don't
know it's hosed, they may sit around forever waiting for the other end
to respond to a message that never got sent.
I will test your solution, but it looks fine to me at first glance.
You can assume that I didn't find any problems if I don't report any
More information about the rsync