Write failed flushing stdout buffer.

[Dave Dykstra]

The "upd" message looks like a file which you don't have permission to
read.

Other than that, I don't know what to tell you.  I don't have Free BSD so
I can't reproduce the problem.  You're going to have to debug it further
yourself, or wait to see if somebody else has the problem.

- Dave Dykstra

On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 12:44:37PM -0500, Daniel wrote:
>  ssh get's used by default when I don't specify otherwise.
> I'm using rsync  version 2.5.2  protocol version 26
> on FreeBSD on both machines, currently.
> 
> Any ideas? I tried implicitly using --rsh=/usr/bin/ssh which doesn't work
> either.
> 
> Somtimes I get this error:
> 
> send_files failed to open upd: Permission denied
> wrote 48 bytes  read 213358 bytes  14717.66 bytes/sec
> total size is 420008408  speedup is 1968.12
> Write failed flushing stdout buffer.
> write stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> Daniel
> 
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 01:45:10PM -0500, lists at debonair.net wrote:
> > >            3 100%    0.00kB/s    0:00:00
> > > wrote 30496 bytes  read 327051 bytes  14593.76 bytes/sec
> > > total size is 419896352  speedup is 1174.38
> > > Write failed flushing stdout buffer.
> > > write stdout: Broken pipe
> > >
> > > time /usr/local/bin/rsync -avzP host: /bkup-zone --delete
> > >
> > > this is the command which is being run, and I get the above error message
> > > everytime. The phenomenon doesn't happen when just copying certain
> > > directories, but only when I do the full backup (size approx 126M).
> > >
> > > rsync  version 2.5.1  protocol version 25
> > >
> > > help appriciated, i've checked everywhere for answers.
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> >
> > There's no string "Write failed" in rsync 2.5.1 source so that message
> > must be coming from rsh.  Is it rsync 2.5.1 on both sides?  What operating
> > systems?
> >
> > - Dave Dykstra
> >
> >
> 
> Please Note: No trees were destroyed in the sending of this contaminant free
> message. However, a signicant number of electrons may have been inconvenienced.
> 
>