rsync+ tidyup (was Re: move rsync development tree to BitKeeper?)

[Martin Pool]

On  6 Dec 2001, Jos Backus <josb at cncdsl.com> wrote:
> I will also pound a little bit more on the rsync+ bits. Two more small nits:
> 
> rsync.1: -f, --read-batch=FILE       read batch file
> rsync.yo: -f, --read-batch=FILE       read batch file
> 
> Here, FILE should be EXT, as it specifies the extension for the
> batch files.



> 
> Another thought: maybe we should reserve -f and -F for something else and just
> stick with the long options? What do you think?

That sounds like a good idea, as long as not too many people have
started using them already.


-- 
Martin 

The daffodils are coming. Are you?
      linux.conf.au, February 2002, Brisbane, Australia
                                --- http://www.linux.org.au/conf