rsync+ tidyup (was Re: move rsync development tree to BitKeeper?)

Martin Pool mbp at
Thu Jan 3 18:52:08 EST 2002

On  6 Dec 2001, Jos Backus <josb at> wrote:
> I will also pound a little bit more on the rsync+ bits. Two more small nits:
> rsync.1: -f, --read-batch=FILE       read batch file
> rsync.yo: -f, --read-batch=FILE       read batch file
> Here, FILE should be EXT, as it specifies the extension for the
> batch files.

> Another thought: maybe we should reserve -f and -F for something else and just
> stick with the long options? What do you think?

That sounds like a good idea, as long as not too many people have
started using them already.


The daffodils are coming. Are you?, February 2002, Brisbane, Australia

More information about the rsync mailing list