mixed case file systems.

Peter Tattam peter at jazz-1.trumpet.com.au
Fri Apr 19 18:59:01 EST 2002


Given the interoperability problems between versions and the risk of data loss,
I think I will have to wait till this option is in the mainstream.  My
alternative workaround to to write a utility to rename all files on the errant
file system to be all lower case.

Thanks for the help anyway.

Peter

On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, David Bolen wrote:

> Martin Pool [mbp at samba.org] writes:
> 
> > On 18 Apr 2002, David Bolen <db3l at fitlinxx.com> wrote:
> > > A few caveats - both ends have to support the option - I couldn't make
> > > it backwards compatible because both ends exchange information about a
> > > sorted file list that has to sort the same way on either side (which
> > > very subtly bit me when I first did this).
> > 
> > I was just going to say that :-)
> 
> Heh .. and wow, is it confusing if you mess that up.  Randomly
> transferring files that it shouldn't be, but even better, putting the
> contents of one file into another silently.  It seems to me that it
> would have been better to have the side generating the list control
> the sequence and the receiving side simply obey it as transmitted, but
> that's neither here nor there at this point.
> 
> The issue with the new command line option was a general issue of
> versioning command line options - since they get transmitted,
> obviously, on the command line, it's prior to any option negotiation.
> So I couldn't figure out any clean way to negotiate away from the
> ignore case if the remote side didn't support it.  Originally I wanted
> it to default to case-insensitive under Windows, but that was guaranteed
> to break older versions, so I went back to an explicit option in all
> cases.  But that seems to be a general issue with evolving options.
> 
> Actually, it was this issue that also led me to add a small bit of
> code to io.c so that on an unexpected tag, it would dump any pending
> data (as ASCII if printable, hex otherwise), since without that you
> never got any of the remote command line parsing errors shown.  But
> there are problems with that too since sometimes you may have a bunch
> of data in the stream on a real protocol failure.
> 
> > I'll put this into the patches/ repository.  I'd like to study the 
> > problem a bit more and see if there isn't a better solution before
> > we merge it.  Perhaps something like the --fuzzy patch will make it
> > detect them as renames.
> 
> No problem - aside from the options processing (which is also the bulk
> of the patch), the patch does have the property that it's very simple;
> one comparison routine change and one new flag supplied to the
> existing fnmatch library module which already supported
> case-insensitivity as an option.
> 
> -- David
> 
> /-----------------------------------------------------------------------\
>  \               David Bolen            \   E-mail: db3l at fitlinxx.com  /
>   |             FitLinxx, Inc.            \  Phone: (203) 708-5192    |
>  /  860 Canal Street, Stamford, CT  06902   \  Fax: (203) 316-5150     \
> \-----------------------------------------------------------------------/
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
> 

--
Peter R. Tattam                            peter at trumpet.com
Managing Director,    Trumpet Software International Pty Ltd
Hobart, Australia,  Ph. +61-3-6245-0220,  Fax +61-3-62450210





More information about the rsync mailing list