efficient file appends

rsync at ka9q.net rsync at ka9q.net
Fri Dec 14 05:23:25 EST 2001

>This really is a minor point because as Martin pointed out, the fact that
>rsync's pipelining would be defeated means that the idea would have a
>drastic effect on throughput.

Okay, everyone has convinced me that my problem (excessive traffic in
the reverse direction) is best solved by simply specifying a large
checksum block size when transferring files that change only by

Now if we can only find the bug that corrupts data when compression is
enabled and a large block size is specified, I'll be in good shape!


More information about the rsync mailing list