[clug] Man pages.
Lana Brindley
mail at lanabrindley.com
Mon Jul 27 02:49:28 UTC 2015
On 27/07/15 11:40, Scott Ferguson wrote:
<snip>
>
> If he was referring to the content of man pages. Determining the
> readability of man pages (or any technical documentation) is not as
> simple as assessing it by readability tests designed for non-technical
> writing - for obvious reasons.
I know you say it's obvious, but I don't understand. Why should tech
comms be held to a different level of readability to non-tech comms?
Can you expand?
L
--
Lana Brindley
writer:speaker:blogger
http://lanabrindley.com
"Quantum mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of."
More information about the linux
mailing list