[clug] Man pages.

Lana Brindley mail at lanabrindley.com
Mon Jul 27 02:49:28 UTC 2015


On 27/07/15 11:40, Scott Ferguson wrote:

<snip>
>
> If he was referring to the content of man pages. Determining the
> readability of man pages (or any technical documentation) is not as
> simple as assessing it by readability tests designed for non-technical
> writing - for obvious reasons.

I know you say it's obvious, but I don't understand. Why should tech
comms be held to a different level of readability to non-tech  comms?
Can you expand?

L

-- 
Lana Brindley
writer:speaker:blogger
http://lanabrindley.com

"Quantum mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of."




More information about the linux mailing list