[clug] [OT] The Register is trying to crowfund $100-$250K for indep study on NBN
bob at cs.anu.edu.au
Thu Jun 20 00:56:19 MDT 2013
On 20/06/13 14:08, steve jenkin wrote:
> [bail now if you don't care for the NBN and Politics]
> A lot of you on-list will have opinions about how the NBN should be
> built. If you're like me, you want to scream at the radio/TV when
> inane political comments about the NBN are made/reported by
> politicians and others on both sides.
> Here's a chance for us to collectively "put our money where our mouth is".
> A little study like this is unlikely to change the outcome of the next
> election, but it will help "keep the B's honest". It won't stop the
> NBN-haters or fanboi's dukeing it out still all over the Internet.
> That fine sport will continue into the next decade.
> It will give voters some firm facts to push-back on _both_ political
> parties. If politicians see an issue turn against them in polls, they
> will respond unless they're ideologically bound to it.
> * What broadband service does Australia and comparable nations require
> in the future?
> * What broadband connection technology provides the longest likely
> working life and lowest operational cost to meet the demand identified
> in question one?
> * What will entrepreneurs in business and government do with the NBN?
> Rephrased on 'Pozible' site as:
> We want to address that with an independent study to answer three big
> NBN questions:
> * What do we REALLY NEED?
> * What's the BEST TECHNOLOGY to build with?
> * What happens AFTER we build the NBN?
And, of course, here is the big problem. The first question is
pozibly quite ill-phrased.
Who is "we"? Is "we":
- Australian businesses (small, medium, large)?
- multi-national corporations?
- the government?
- the health-care sector?
- education providers (primary, secondary, tertiary)?
- the gamers?
- the guys at home watching porn?
- the single mums in woop-woop struggling to feed their kids?
- the politicians, pozibly trying to build monuments to themselves?
And what is the time frame "we" REALLY NEED to provide this in?
6 months? 12 months? 5 years? 20 years?
And what do "we" REALLY NEED it for?
Remember, we are talking about $29BN+ - that's more than
I think that most people (including myself) just can't conceive what
an enormous amount of money that really is. Is it really a good value
More information about the linux