[clug] Wikipedia and Deletionism
kdambiec at fsfe.org
Wed Mar 24 23:46:14 MDT 2010
Looks like someone has already discussed if it is notable from the
Mediawiki talk page.
" Currently I don't see any sources showing that this software is
notable. If it is, shouldn't such be justified be justified by
citations? Seems a lot of the article may be self-published or
non-notable, though I may not understand these issues well."
Ive begun looking at Citizenpedia as an alternative to Wikipedia recently.
On 25/03/10 3:03 PM, Jeffm wrote:
> My response to this would be to propose deletion of the page about
> media wiki - it doesn't run on windows so it's obviously no notable.
> When that gets shouted down pick something less ridiculous and keep
> drawing them out to find were the line exists. As to deletion of the
> page about ANU or another Australian uni for that matter propose
> deletion of UCLA or Harvard :-).
> What's notable to someone depends on the phsycological distance from
> them I suppose.
> On 25/03/10 2:50 PM, Karun Dambiec wrote:
>> Looks like the Maui Cluster Scheduler has just been proposed for
>> deletion again. And the page about Andrew Tridgell recently.
>> It seems they have been going overboard recently, and Im finding that
>> wikipedia is becoming more less useful, and the english version is
>> developing a US bias.
>> The other languages are not, due to them not being the main language
>> of the US.
More information about the linux