[clug] EXT4 Reliability [SEC=PERSONAL]

Roppola, Antti - BRS Antti.Roppola at daff.gov.au
Tue Sep 29 17:46:44 MDT 2009


Now that's an exchange that neatly demonstrates a subtle difference and
why I'm still using ext3.

FAT32 is a well known filesystem that can be reasonably reliably be
implemented, read & modified by a large number of operating systems,
device drivers and appliances. It misses out on some nifty features like
journaling. But hey it's not too bad and there's not too many bad
drivers around.

In comparison, Ext3 is being written to and read from almost entirely a
single code base of known quality. As it's freely available, I'd be very
surprised if anyone tried to re-implement an ext3 library from scratch.
There's a lot of ext3 installs out there and the ext3 code base has been
put through all sorts of circumstances over many years since 2001. There
was a couple of file system corruption bugs early on, but it's been
pretty quiet. All my digital photos are backed up on ext3.

Ext4 looks like it makes a number of improvements for reliability and
performance. But as the reference code base really didn't start becoming
mainstream until 2008, I'm not going to use it for my digital photos
just yet.

Cheers,

Antti

-----Original Message-----
Daniel Pittman wrote:

Anshul Gupta <email.agupta at gmail.com> writes:

> FAT32 is the most portable filesystem but not as stable and reliable 
> as ext[34].

I am surprised you suggest this.  Are you referring to the issues that
the FAT structure introduces WRT the Unix [id]node convention, or the
renaming issues, or something else?


------
IMPORTANT - This message has been issued by The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF). The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain sensitive and/or legally privileged material. It is your responsibility to check any attachments for viruses and defects before opening or sending them on. 

Any reproduction, publication, communication, re-transmission, disclosure, dissemination or other use of the information contained in this e-mail by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. The taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments. If you have received this e-mail as part of a valid mailing list and no longer want to receive a message such as this one advise the sender by return e-mail accordingly. Only e-mail correspondence which includes this footer, has been authorised by DAFF 

------



More information about the linux mailing list