[clug] EXT4 Reliability
Anshul Gupta
email.agupta at gmail.com
Tue Sep 29 02:59:28 MDT 2009
EXT4 is stable as of 2.6.28 and I don't doubt it's stability. However
for storing my important data I will still go for ext3. Also not to
mention that not all my computers are running recent kernel and for
USB disk I would like a filesystem recognised by most.
You can even mount ext3 partition as ext4 to get some performance
improvements from ext4 drivers.
Cheers, Anshul
On 29/09/2009, at 6:32 PM, Ian McLeod wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am compiling a backup of wedding master tapes and photos and was
> about to use the usual route of NTFS support on an external drive in
> Ubuntu - and stopped and thought - do I *need* NTFS for a backup
> drive? Why not use a (possibly more reliable) Linux file system?
>
> So I promptly re-formatted a USB drive as EXT4 and I am happily
> copying across gigs of precious data after chown'ing to my username.
>
> Is EXT4 reliable for USB external drive backup purposes? Quick
> reading on the Internet seems to suggest so. I presume especially
> compared to NTFS.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ian
> --
> linux mailing list
> linux at lists.samba.org
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux
More information about the linux
mailing list