[clug] aggregating disks across multiple machines
daniel at rimspace.net
Mon Oct 26 06:15:12 MDT 2009
Andrew Janke <a.janke at gmail.com> writes:
>> 1. Staff should keep only working copies locally, the master should be
>> elsewhere, ideally in a VCS style "edit, then commit" arrangement.
> Except in the case where the data is enormous. In what we do for
> example I can generate 1TB in 24 hours without any sweat.
I should perhaps have said "mutate, then save" or something, since I imagine
that you either produce smaller results after processing that data, or you
have an entirely different scale of problem to the OP. :)
✣ Daniel Pittman ✉ daniel at rimspace.net ☎ +61 401 155 707
♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
Looking for work? Love Perl? In Melbourne, Australia? We are hiring.
More information about the linux