[clug] OT: naughty hyperlinks to cost $11,000/day

[Grant Baldwin]

Probably because it, like most other open video and photo hosts, wound  
up making available something meeting the legal definition (at least)  
of kiddie porn, for at least long enough for a complaint to be noted.

Then there is also the status of x or nc rated material being offered  
outside the ACT, which raises questions about federal vs. state  
enforcement that I don't recall the answers to.

Get used to your porn, especially anything web 2.0ish, being illegal.

--
Grant Baldwin
M: 0401 047 734
E: Grant.Baldwin at anu.edu.au

On 19/03/2009, at 17:28, Alex Satrapa <grail at goldweb.com.au> wrote:

> On 19/03/2009, at 16:47 , Ric de France wrote:
>
>> 2009/3/19 Alex Satrapa <grail at goldweb.com.au>
>> ... the list looks pretty awful, and can understand why some of the  
>> stuff is there... but other stuff like censoring some other  
>> wikileaks pages and some wikipedia pages is just straight out  
>> censorship...
>
> They've put RedTube on the list too! Is anyone aware of *illegal*  
> content on that site? The best I can come up with is depictions of  
> sex acts that fail to follow safe sex practices. It's mostly just  
> (poor quality) porn.
>
> Not that I've actually *seen* any of the stuff on RedTube, since the  
> whole site is illegal, and I'm a law-abiding citizen.
>
> Alex
>
> -- 
> linux mailing list
> linux at lists.samba.org
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux