[clug] Google compared to latest Microsoft evilness

[Hal Ashburner]

Brendan Jurd wrote:
> 2009/7/10 Jacinta Richardson <jarich at perltraining.com.au>:
>   
>> Chris Smart wrote:
>>     
>>> Pretty sure "guy" is a unisex term these days ;-)
>>>       
>> Only in limited circumstances.  For a lot of the population, in a lot of
>> circumstances it still means male.
>>     
>
> Maybe.  But have you got a better alternative?
>
> "People"?  Too formal.
> "Peeps"?  Retarded.
> "Folks"?  Old fashioned.
>
>   
I'd rather be mistaken for old fashioned than something else folks. :)