[clug] Five in 24 hours

[Neill Cox]

The issue is whether the small amount of spam that we receive justifies
making the list harder to use, and imposing more work on the list manager.

So far the majority opinion is that it does not.

My vote remains for an open list - allowing people to post without joining
seems much friendlier to me and the CLUG spam is a tiny fraction of the spam
I receive every day.

Most of the spam is filtered away by gmail anyway :)

Cheers,
Neill

On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Jim Croft <jim.croft at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there an ideological position here I do not understand?
>
> jim (holding back personal inclinations to unrestrained chastisement,
> not excluding extreme violence  and torture with that other operating
> system, of all spammers and their issue)
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Stephen Rothwell<sfr at canb.auug.org.au>
> wrote:
> > Hi Brett,
> >
> > On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:46:12 +1000 Brett Worth <brett at worth.id.au>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> What's going on!
> >>
> >> Is it time to revisit member only posting?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
> > http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ <http://www.canb.auug.org.au/%7Esfr/>
> >
> > --
> > linux mailing list
> > linux at lists.samba.org
> > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> _________________
> Jim Croft ~ jim.croft at gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~
> http://www.google.com/profiles/jim.croft
>
> ... in pursuit of the meaning of leaf ...
> --
> linux mailing list
> linux at lists.samba.org
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux
>