[clug] Internet banking and browser compatibility
Alex Satrapa
grail at goldweb.com.au
Wed Feb 18 22:11:36 GMT 2009
On 18/02/2009, at 18:55 , Sam Couter wrote:
> Yes, I see that your X.509 client certificate is no safer than the
> password you'd have to use in its absence. So why is it you're
> trying to
> do any banking at all from this computer? Your client certificate
> hasn't
> made it any harder than it was already.
I wouldn't do my banking from a work supplied computer in the first
place. An X.509 client certificate isn't going to suddenly make the
work computers more secure for my purposes.
> We can even get to Youtube, but not Google Video.
Funnily enough I can get to Slashdot, but not "The Register", and
"Delicious" is barred as "entertainment" while "Hackzine" is barred as
"Malicious".
This is what we get for letting morons breed and have jobs.
Alex
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 220 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/attachments/20090219/ab4027fc/PGP.bin
More information about the linux
mailing list