[clug] Don't reply to spam?

Chris Smart mail at christophersmart.com
Thu Apr 23 04:30:22 GMT 2009

2009/4/23 Alex Satrapa <alexsatrapa at mac.com>:
> No, because then you have two spam threads to ignore - the spam itself and
> the metaspam from people spamming the list with spam complaints about the
> spam.

Sure, I'd prefer no-one paid any attention to the spam in the first
place. But if they are going to, then I'd personally prefer that they
didn't reply to the original spam thread.

Starting a new one and referencing the original spam is, IMHO, better
than sending the original spam message back and forth with legitimate
emails in tow. People who are on my "accept and never send to spam"
list start replying to something that was marked as spam it's rather



More information about the linux mailing list