[clug] Kernels are easy, ls is the hard part!

Neill Cox neill at quokka.ace-hosting.com.au
Sat Sep 15 07:02:33 GMT 2007

On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:41:24AM +1000, steve jenkin wrote:
> Craig Small wrote on 14/9/07 8:45 PM:
> This is not a rhetorical question, but one that has concerned me for
> quite some time and both of you, as people to self profess to "getting
> it" with GNU & RMS, should be able to explain to me:
>     Why does GNU continue with Hurd now there is a Free (as in beer &
> speech) GPL'd kernel (Linux)?

Why on earth shouldn't they? Is this going to be a one fricking kernel
argument?  Even the BSD's have more than one kernel.


More information about the linux mailing list