[clug] Revision control systems [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Steven Hanley sjh at svana.org
Wed Jun 13 04:05:55 GMT 2007

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 12:58:13PM +1000, Roppola, Antti - BRS wrote:
> Paul wrote:
> > This is indeed true.  I can see I'm going to have to learn a bit more 
> > about git, even if it's to see what I and/or Linus is missing.  For 
> > now, though, you'll have to put up with me corrupting your minds and 
> > speaking on what I know.  Until I learn how to use git, Subversion 
> > will be simpler for me... :-)
> There was a really good CLUG talk some years back contrasting the
> different versioning tools and their strengths/weaknesses. Without being
> able to see YouTube here at work, I'd wager that Linus is more
> interested in distributed patch management (like darcs,
> http://www.darcs.net/DarcsWiki) than maintaining a centralised corporate
> store of source code (all our staff are in this building).
> Until all our developers have IDEs that can back-end onto git,
> Subversion will remain the least sucky solution. ;-p

Probably the talk given by Martin Pool (author of bazaar

Contrasting many different systems and providing reasoning behind uses of
the different systems, alos features of the different distributed systms
compared with each other.

	See You

Steven Hanley sjh at svana.org http://svana.org/sjh/diary
it's a narrow margin, just room enough for regret
in the inch and a half between hey, how ya been?
and can i kiss you yet?
   Providence - To The Teeth - Ani

More information about the linux mailing list